The liberal-left are resorting to outright deliberate lying to try to smuggle Corbyn into power (even though they probably know it would be a total disaster). We documented the other day a case where the Independent lied about what Johnson had said. Continue reading “Straight lies in the liberal press in an attempt to win the election”
There is a strong movement in public discourse in the UK to only permit a single, approved, narrative on a wide range of questions. The unifying and ‘moral’ basis of the discourse seems to be something to do with victimhood.
It is not allowed to express contrary opinions. People who do are hung, drawn and quartered. Their views are so obviously bigoted and wrong that no one needs to actually present a reason why they are wrong. In expressing contrary opinions they are not seen as mistaken but as evil. If people make a public humiliating apology – and almost all do – they may be permitted to remain in the fold, on license. Otherwise they are exiled. Politicians must spent a lot of effort making sure they don’t transgress. It is obvious that many politicians express opinions which they don’t hold so as not to fall foul of the thought police.
Who is driving this discourse – which has arisen only in the last 10-20 years or so?
Therapy aims at inculcating a massive (overwhelming) sense of dependency in the patient.
The primary dependency is, of course, the dependency on the therapist. The motive is money and power. The same motives that power any cult. But in fostering this primary dependency therapy will foster any other dependency it can. Dependency on family and authority of any kind feature strongly. Because it encourages dependency on the family and on social structures therapy avoids the appearance of a cult and even wins the approval of power. Continue reading “Dependency [Topic: Psychotherapy]”
A headline in today’s Independent reads:
Boris Johnson described most deprived members of society as ‘chavs, losers, burglars and drug addicts’
The casual reader might be mistaken into believing that Boris Johnson did this; that he is an “uncaring Tory” or whatever the motif is this is supposed to foster.
It is in fact a straight lie – of the kind that abounds in the liberal press. Continue reading “Liberals misrepresenting Boris Johnson and paving the way for fascism”
This may seem like a small point; just a throw-away line in a single Guardian article. But I pick on it because it seems indicative of a certain perspective. The comment appears in an article on some sort of a spy scandal in Serbia. (Allegations of a Russian spy paying off a Serbian official; good TV but hardly news – all spy agencies pay informers/agents in ‘enemy’ and even ‘allied’ countries all the time). The article is by Shaun Walker who used to be based in Moscow where he churned out a series of anti-Russia propaganda articles. This is what struck me: Continue reading “Russia – a country or a demon?”
The White Helmets is a group in Syria who have been very lavishly funded by the UK’s Foreign Office  and by the US to produce stories favourable to the UK’s / Western narrative on Syria. The narrative is that Assad “must go” because he “murders his own people”. The White Helmets was set up to document these alleged atrocities. Along the way they have no doubt helped rescue people from burning buildings – all the while of course generating excellent footage for the Assad is murdering his own people line. Continue reading “The abyss we live in when the concept of truth is abolished. (aka. The UK’s Guardian)”
This is a piece by Gary Younge in the Guardian about a photo exhibition at the Tate in London. Gary Younge starts off by mocking John Cleese (an actor whose contribution to British culture far exceeds anything offered by Younge): Continue reading “The strange way that racism is treated in the Guardian”