The New Observer is in the process of moving from a hosted WordPress site to a site on WordPress.com.
Please bear with us during this transition period – some links may not work. We are working to fix everything, but it may take some time, as the editor only has a limited amount of time available for this work. Thank you for your patience.
Finding credible books on Russia and Russian history is not easy.
By far the most credible this author has read is Paul Dukes A History of Russia.  Most of the others I’ve tried are simply works of propaganda – full of bile and hatred for the (unknown) other and an insult to any idea of scholarship.
I don’t know if the above applies to this one, “Russia’s Crony Capitalism: The Path from Market Economy to Kleptocracy” by Anders Asund (I haven’t read it) but there is a clue in the publisher’s preview on Amazon: Continue reading “Anti-Russia books”
Anyone who watches how the Western media and political class construct their ‘truths’ will have noticed the rough elements of the pattern. Something can be suggested in one quarter, for example in the US State Department, and then some ‘evidence’ is adduced – circumstantial, based on probability and relying on the most curious of sources (for example ex MI5 officers freelancing for a bit of extra money) but evidence nonetheless. At this stage people talk about “high probability”. But, wait a few weeks and what was previously a question of probability is now assumed fact. And the truth has also been cleansed of its dubious sources. It is simply cited as as obviously true as the earth is round and therefore there is no longer any need to reference it. And, it seems that 90% of them believe it themselves.
It turns out that this is an age old practice. Russian (Ukrainian) writer Nikolay Gogol had seen it all in the 19th century:
That both ladies were finally and unshakably convinced of that which they previously had been supposing as mere supposition is nothing unusual. Our fraternity, we intelligent people, as we call ourselves, behave in almost the same way, and our learned discourses serve as proof of that. At first, the scholar approaches them like an uncommon kind of blackguard. He begins timidly, moderately, he begins with the humblest kind of inquiry: ‘Is that not the origin? Was it not from that particular little corner that such-and-such a country received its name?’ or, ‘Does this document not belong to another, later time?’ or, ‘When we say this particular people, do we really not mean this other people?’ He immediately cites this and that ancient writer, and as soon as he detects a hint or something that strikes him as a hint, then he hits his full stride, plucks up his courage, feels perfectly at ease in conversing with the ancient writers, puts questions to them and even answers them himself, completely forgetting that he has started out with a modest supposition. It now seems to him that he sees what’s what, that it is clear, and his discourse concludes with the words: ‘And so, this is how it was, this is how a certain people should be understood, this is the viewpoint from which we should look at the topic!’ Then, from the lecture platform, he declaims it for all to hear, and a newly discovered truth embarks on its journey through the world, gathering to itself followers and admirers. 
- Gogol, Nikolay. Dead Souls (Penguin Classics) (pp. 212-213). Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle Edition.
The Labour MP David Lammy appears not to have grasped that the Nazis killed 6 million, or more, innocents – brutally murdered them in gas chambers, by all accounts.
In likening a faction in the Tory party to the Nazis Mr Lammy reflects the total collapse of values in British politics. Like so much in the vacuity which passes nowadays for public discourse these days we see events of real seriousness devalued. Continue reading “Bosh in modern UK politics”
Julian Assange has been arrested on a US extradition warrant.
Julian Assange has committed no crimes on UK soil (except breach of bail, which is a separate matter). The charges in the US are political matters. In essence Assange published information related to US lies and war crimes (e.g. the infamous massacre committed by laughing Apache pilots) committed in the course of an illegal invasion of Iraq. None of this is contentious. Plain matters of fact.
It is horrible indictment of the absolute gutter the UK political class lives in that they have permitted some thugs to drag Assange from the embassy and bundle him into a van. Such actions are worthy of Nazi Germany.
The longer this takes, the greater the risk of the UK never leaving at all. It would mean letting the Brexit that the British people voted for slip through our fingers. I will not stand for that. It is essential we deliver what people voted for, and to do that we need to get a deal over the line.
This writer just can’t understand this. And Theresa May is not the only one who goes on about how we ‘must’ leave the EU because ‘the people voted for it’. Continue reading “Brexit madness”
There is sometimes a call that people who peddle hate-speech should be “de-platformed”. We should, it is suggested, deny them the “oxygen of publicity”, which they crave. But when it comes to hating Russia and spreading false stories and myths all is open season. Strange. At least; irrational. Continue reading “We were wrong but Russia is responsible for us being wrong (The BBC’s correspondent on Mueller)”